The Day America's Decline Began...

Rupert Cornwell: THE DAY AMERICA'S DECLINE BEGAN

Wednesday, 7 September 2011

Ten years. An eyeblink in the eternal march of history - yet sufficient
distance to gauge the impact of America's most dreadful day, one that no one
old enough to remember will ever forget. After 10 years, winners and losers
can be declared. And in the case of 9/11, it becomes more evident by the
day, both sides are losers.

The most obvious one of course is Osama bin Laden. The organisation that he
founded has been not only decapitated, but decimated. Hardly a week passes
now without the death or capture of top al-Qa'ida commanders, their security
presumably compromised by the documents seized during the raid in Pakistan
in which Bin Laden was killed. Touch wood, there seems scant chance of the
spectacular 10th anniversary attack for which, those documents show, he was
desperately trying to organise. 

As for his notion that violent Islamic jihad might create a new caliphate
stretching from Indonesia to Spain - that seems even more far-fetched than
it did 10 years ago. Even the "Arab Spring" of uprisings against the secular
Middle Eastern dictators that Bin Laden hated is no vindication of his
warped ideology. 

The protest reflects far more a popular yearning to enjoy the simple rights
of political freedom and economic opportunity that we take for granted, than
any answer of 9/11's call to strike down a decadent yet overbearing West.
And yet my guess is that Bin Laden would be fairly pleased right now, even
though by any standard measure, he's lost the fight he started. 

But what about the ledger on the other side. Yes, America's leaders can
claim that, contrary to every prediction at the time, there has been no
terrorist attack on the US mainland since. And yes, the particular group
that carried out the attacks on New York and Washington DC has been largely
destroyed. But it took the mightiest military on earth almost 10 years to
track down and eliminate its most wanted single target, while the terrorist
movement for which he was the inspiration has become a Hydra. Chop off one
head in Pakistan, Afghanistan or Yemen and others start to grow elsewhere.
And in almost every other sense, these past 10 years have been a tale of
mistakes made, opportunities missed and lessons not learned. 

Consider first the opportunities missed. In the aftermath of 9/11, the US
enjoyed an outpouring of global support and sympathy unmatched since the
Second World War: "We Are All Americans Now," proclaimed that headline in Le
Monde, speaking on behalf of the European country that has more hang-ups
about America than most. 

Within a couple of years, however, that sympathy had been utterly
squandered. George W Bush and Dick Cheney were Ugly Americans reborn,
loathed across the Arab world and beyond. Barack Obama has repaired much of
the damage among traditional US allies. But in Islamic countries America's
reputation remains in tatters, despite its deliberately low profile in the
campaign to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi. ("Leading from behind," one White
House aide injudiciously described the approach, provoking scorn and anger
from the president's Republican foes, insulted that the US was not visibly
heading this latest Western military foray against an Arab land.) But at
least Obama had tried to take the mistakes to heart. 

And even setting aside Libya, America remains bogged down in two wars in
Islamic countries, as a result of 9/11. The October 2001 invasion of
Afghanistan to remove the Taliban government that not only sheltered
al-Qa'ida but was literally of a piece with it, was absolutely justifiable -
though Bin Laden and his cohorts should have been eliminated within months
at Tora Bora. But why did everything take so much longer than it should
have? The answer of course lies in that other mistake of the Bush
administration, arguably the biggest single foreign policy blunder in all US
history: the war of choice against Iraq that has succeeded only in
strengthening the position of America's arch enemy Iran across the entire
region. 

According to one estimate, Iraq and Afghanistan may end up costing $4
trillion between them, an outlay covered thus far not by raising taxes as
most wars are covered, but by borrowing. To that extent, 9/11 has
contributed to the current economic crisis, helping create the mountain of
debt that now ties Obama's hands. 

And that borrowing continues. America is still in Iraq and may retain a
presence there for decades. The same goes for Afghanistan, even though the
killing of Bin Laden and the dispersal of al-Qa'ida to other countries mean
there is no sane reason why tens of thousands of US troops should remain
there, on a nation-building mission impossible. Afghanistan has already
provided its own grim 10th anniversary of the 2001 attacks: August 2011 was
the deadliest month ever for US forces deployed there. 

Contributing to the two longest wars in the country's history were two more
pervasive errors. The first was the "Global War on Terror" itself. At the
time, the Bush administration's decision to treat 9/11 as an act of war
seemed to make sense; the country after all had suffered something that
neither Hitler nor the Soviet Union could manage, a devastating foreign
attack on its own soil. 

But declaration of the war on terror was the slippery slope that led to so
much that proved disastrous to America's reputation: torture, Abu Ghraib,
rendition, Guantanamo Bay, the denial of basic defendants' rights to
captured "enemy combatants" (many of whom, it belatedly transpired, were
innocent.) How much better to have treated the attacks as a criminal matter,
monstrous to be sure, but which could have been handled by civilian courts. 

But the US strategy post-9/11 contained an even greater mistake: a refusal
to face up to the basic dilemma at the core of its policy - that some of its
main allies in the "War on Terror" were in fact accomplices or even
instigators of that terrorism. One of them, Pakistan, sheltered Bin Laden.
Another, Saudi Arabia, provided 15 of the 19 hijackers. 

September 11, 2001 was a chance for Bush to take a real hack at the Gordian
knot of oil and security that distorts US policy in the Middle East, by
increasing the gasoline tax, reducing its addiction to imported oil, and
boosting alternative sources of energy. But next to nothing was done. The
world was told, you are either with us or against. For the 99 per cent of
the population not involved with the armed forces, Bush's rallying cry was:
"Keep on driving, keep on spending." 

The real world, however, moved on. Amid Washington's obsession with terror,
China has stepped up its economic challenge. The present moment has odd
echoes of the past - a whiff of the frivolity of those carefree days before
the real September 11, when the fuss was about shark attacks in Florida, and
whether a California Congressman was having an affair with a missing
Washington intern. 

And here we are 10 years on, amid a gathering economic crisis far more
obvious than the clues back then to an impending terrorist attack, wondering
if the magnificently absurd Sarah Palin will run for the White House,
watching in disbelief as the two parties squabble over the timing of a
presidential speech. 9/11 is not the cause of American decline. But it's as
good a marker as any of when that decline began.